In 2019, a Pew Research Center survey found that “nearly seven in ten Catholics (69%) say they personally believe that during Catholic Mass, the bread and wine used in Holy Communion “’are symbols of the body and blood of Jesus Christ.’ Just one-third of U.S. Catholics (31%) say they believe that “during Catholic Mass, the bread and wine actually become the body and blood of Jesus.’” The United States Conference of American Bishops reacted quickly to clarify what is meant by the “Real Presence” of Christ at Mass. Corpus Christi Sunday is an opportunity to reflect on the presence of Christ in the Mass.
It must be said, however, that, the Pew survey was flawed, allowing only two possible answers, both poorly framed: “Regardless of the official teaching of the Catholic Church, what do you personally believe about the bread and wine used for Communion? During Catholic Mass, the bread and wine…[1] Actually become the body and blood of Jesus Christ [2] Are symbols of the body and blood of Jesus Christ.” The question over-simplifies “symbol,” misunderstands “transubstantiation” of the bread and wine, and omits the rich concept of the presence of Christ. Authentic Catholic teaching on the presence of Christ in the Eucharist insists on a fourfold presence of Christ – in the people, in the Word, in the priest-presider, and in the Eucharistic elements.
It is better to focus on the Eucharist (Greek “thanksgiving”) instead of Real Presence. The New Testament has four accounts of its institution (1 Cor 11:23-25; Matt 26:26-28; Mark 14:22-24; Luke 22:17-20; cf. John 6: 32-58). From earliest times, the Eucharist was a regular part of worship and Christians referred to the elements of bread and wine as the Body and Blood of Christ. Even when Christians spoke of the elements as “symbols” or “antitypes,” there was no intention of denying the Presence. As early as the fourth century, language about the transformation of the elements became customary. Even before this period, some theologians wrote as if they believed in the persistence of the bread and wine after the consecration, whereas others wrote as though they held them to be no longer there. That same division of opinion has persisted in Western Christendom and remains a live question for some Christians, especially for heirs of the sixteenth-century Reformation. The Catholic Church, however, has always insisted on the word transubstantiation, though in recent years it has allowed alternative expressions for the same reality.
Other important aspects of the Eucharist should not be neglected. One aspect is that is a covenant meal, recalling the Lord’s choice of Israel in Exodus. The Lord chose Israel as “my treasured possession among all peoples, though all the earth is mine. You will be to me a kingdom of priests, a holy nation,” to which the people responded positively (Exod 19:5-6) The covenant was adopted at a meal in which all the people were represented (Exodus 24). That extraordinary meal is celebrated today in the Eucharist, allowing Christians to be assured of the Lord’s election of them and of his presence among them especially in eucharistic assemblies.
The Gospel for this Sunday is an excerpt from Jesus’s lengthy prayer just prior his death asking the Father for three precious gifts for the church: that its members always remain united, that they stand fast against the world’s hatred of them, and that they be conscious of being sent by Christ as heralds of the gospel. A report card on how Christians through the ages have heeded our Lord’s prayer might not have any clear A’s, but perhaps a few B’s and lots of Cs.
Unifying love . In the first century the church stayed united despite major division regarding the extent to which non-Jewish followers of Jesus had to adopt Jewish practices. The synod of Jerusalem deserves great credit for uniting the factions, and in the following centuries councils and church leaders succeeded in achieving clarity on potentially divisive doctrines. From the ninth centuries onward, however, the two great sees of Rome and Constantinople gradually grew apart, the final breach coming in 1054. The sixteenth century Protestant Reformation led to the further breakup of Christian unity and to the founding of churches sometimes at war with each other. Disunion continues today on the local level, but nationally and internationally, fortunately, cooperation continues.
Standing Fast against the World’s Hatred. Inevitably, Christians took their place among the shapers of modern society, especially in Europe and the Americas. Many people, however, took on the habits and customs of the powerful, so that it was sometimes difficult to see how so-called Christian leaders differed from non-Christian leaders in leading the way in peacemaking, care for the poor, and personal morality.
Consciousness of being sent. Becoming a politician is a great vocation, often difficult but still a great opportunity to serve. One can also serve in other places than in the political arena. It is often hard, however, to see Christians as a redemptive presence in the world, and to see Christians as markedly different from those outside the church.
Yet Christ’s prayer remains a powerful incentive today. Grace will be given to serve. May we be conscious of Christ’s example and command as we live our live and plan our futures.
Our ancestors the Israelites suffered a terrible trauma six centuries before Jesus – the destruction of Jerusalem, its Temple, and the exile of much of its population to various cities in the Babylonian Empire. Two prophets – Jeremiah and Ezekiel – argued it was largely the failure of the kings to offer good example and exercise leadership. In speaking to the people, Ezekiel used a common metaphor for kings, shepherd.
In the light of past failures of shepherd, it was a bold move for Jesus to call himself a shepherd. But Jesus quotes a key sentence of Ezekiel, which rids the term of its negative history: “I myself [the Lord] will search for my sheep, and will seek them out. I will gather them . . . will feed them with good pasture…” Jesus contrasts himself with false and self-interested shepherds, whom he brands as thieves and robbers. Strong language from the mouth of Jesus, but prompted by his passionate love for the people. We know how angry we get if people we love are tricked and robbed. Jesus likewise.
Jesus compares himself to a shepherd in two different senses. He is the shepherd who enters through the gate and leads the sheep from the sheepfold to feed in the pasture. He knows their names and calls them one by one. The sheep follow him because they recognize his voice. We have the unforgettable picture of Jesus leading the sheep. In the early church, a frequent depiction of Christ was the Good Shepherd; its function was like a crucifix today.
The second image of Christ is the gate of the sheepfold, which may surprise us. This claim reminds us of Peter’s speech in the first reading, “There is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among mortals by which we must be saved.” We don’t know how God manages things differently for nations than ourselves, but for us Christians Jesus is the One. We should hear his voice alone, for as the gospel says, “The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy. I came that they may have life, and have it abundantly.”
Sometimes we hesitate to bring our needs to God. Why? Often the reasons are two: (1) we don’t think God is interested in us. We are too small, too unimportant; (2) we have been unfaithful in the past and can’t guarantee we won’t sin in the future. But both these attitudes are refuted by Jesus’s comparing his Shepherd’s love for us to the love Father and Son have for each other. They attend to each other, delight in each other, give themselves trustfully to each other. To say it’s “quality love” would be an understatement. It’s stronger and more consistent than anything we can imagine. So, when Jesus says to us, “I am the Good Shepherd,” he’s saying an astonishing and marvelous thing.